Serviio

Google+ albums Web Resource plugin


Allows to stream G+ users private and public photo albums



G+ public album example:

https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/107982474099703846460/albums/5924047856490871153
https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/106661386135469061222/albums/5641152189309370065

To access the private albums you need supply username and password to you account.
Example:

https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/107982474099703846460/albums/5924047856490871153 username=myusername@gmail.com,password=mypassword
https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/106661386135469061222/albums/5641152189309370065 username=myusername@gmail.com,password=mypassword

*Note: The URL’s must be configured as a Web Resource and media type should be configured as Image

Excellent job on this!!!

Nice to see a non-video plugin

Awesome, it'd be great if you could look into the video part of this equation to see if it's possible to play video through serviio hosted on google+ albums

Hi, I installed plugin and tested public Google Plus albums and they work.
But I have problem configuring url with username/password for private albums.

In the example there is space between album url and username/password part.

What needs to be between this two parts, space , underscore, nothing or some other character?

thnx; V.

Hi @kosacrta,

It should be space.

New version of plugin is published.

Hello,

I have just installed this plugin. I can connect to the public album in the example, but I'm trying to connect to one of my private albums, but I'm getting and empty one. I have put my username and password as indicated (separated from the URL by an space character) but it doesn't work. I have also tried to configure it with the authkey provided from google+, that is, https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/<myid>/albums/<albumid>?authkey=<authkey>, as it was a public album, but it neither works.

Any idea? How could a I debug it?

Are you still maintaining this?
Running Serviio PRO v 1.8
Just installed and get the following error using the public examples.
Not investigated further yet, is this a known issue?
Both public examples can be seen in a browser.