Page 1 of 1

avconv vs ffmpeg

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:48 pm
by abubin
I have just installed ubuntu 14.04 and they have removed ffmpeg from the repository. It seems the replacement for ffmpeg is a fork called avconv.

So my question is will serviio continue to use ffmpeg or is there plan to support avconv?

Re: avconv vs ffmpeg

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:10 pm
by grolschie

Re: avconv vs ffmpeg

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:21 pm
by Iveky
switch to fedora. ffmpeg is in its repository.

Re: avconv vs ffmpeg

PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2014 6:39 am
by NX3
Or just compile your own ffmpeg, guide in the wiki.

Sent from my HTC One mini using Tapatalk

Re: avconv vs ffmpeg

PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 3:12 pm
by abubin
i know about the split between avconv and ffmpeg. I am just asking if zip intend to support avconv as well. There sure are alternatives such as compiling ffmpeg or installing from alternative ppa. But for a normal user, installing from repo is still the best way. I am just saying if it is not too much of work then why not, right?

And no, i am not changing to fedora. I am sticking to ubuntu LTS cause I don't have time to install a new os every year.

Re: avconv vs ffmpeg

PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:07 pm
by Iveky
then dont complain ;)

Sent from my LG-E440 using Tapatalk 2

Re: avconv vs ffmpeg

PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 8:16 pm
by grolschie
abubin wrote:I have just installed ubuntu 14.04 and they have removed ffmpeg from the repository. It seems the replacement for ffmpeg is a fork called avconv.


The way I see it, is that problem lies with a decision that Ubuntu have made (i.e. "they have removed ffmpeg from the repository"). Even though Ubuntu have replaced ffmpeg with avconf, avconf is not a "replacement for ffmpeg". It's a fork. It seems easier (to me at least) for both ffmpeg and avconf to be packaged by a distribution, than for software applications to have to support both.

abubin wrote:i know about the split between avconv and ffmpeg. I am just asking if zip intend to support avconv as well. There sure are alternatives such as compiling ffmpeg or installing from alternative ppa. But for a normal user, installing from repo is still the best way.


So you already are aware of PPAs. I don't see the problem then - because they are repositories. Though maybe not as secure or as well maintained as official repos.

I can see that the wiki info could possibly be updated to reflect this.

Re: avconv vs ffmpeg

PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:39 pm
by zip
Definitely sticking with ffmpeg - they have faster development cycle and also backport all the avconv code into ffmpeg, which is not the case for avconv.

Re: avconv vs ffmpeg

PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:56 pm
by grolschie
Here is a possible solution for those using avconv, apparently:
http://forum.serviio.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=16501#p90233

I'm not sure how well this will work though.